Petsas: I will not vote for all lifting of immunity cases concerning ND MPs

Stelios Petsas: Institutional Line connected Lifting Immunity – “No to Blanket Treatment. It is 1 happening that colleagues petition the lifting of their immunity successful bid not to beryllium politically accused of hiding something, and different for an MP, voting according to conscience, to disregard the Constitution and the laws.”

Institutional Clarity and Political Stability

The MP of New Democracy,Stelios Petsas, took a wide and steadfast presumption connected the contented of lifting parliamentary immunity related to the OPEKEPE lawsuit file, stating that helium does not mean to enactment horizontal oregon broad motions for immunity removal.

As helium emphasized:“I volition not ballot for lifting immunity en masse due to the fact that I see it legally unfounded.”

His position, helium explained, is grounded successful the mentation ofArticle 62 of the Greek Constitution, which protects MPs from prosecution for actions performed successful the workout of their parliamentary duties.

“No to Blanket Treatment” – The Core Political Message

Mr. Petsas stressed that the process cannot beryllium approached successful a azygous oregon generalized manner, highlighting the request for case-by-case evaluation.

He underlined that:

• each lawsuit indispensable beryllium assessed individually
• parliamentary enactment cannot beryllium collectively criminalized
• an MP’s ballot remains a substance ofconscience and organization responsibility

The cardinal operation of his involution was:“I bash not judge broad treatment.”

Constitution and Parliamentary Function

The MP placed peculiar accent connected the law magnitude of the issue, noting that:

Article 62 of the Constitution is clear: MPs cannot beryllium prosecuted for the workout of their parliamentary duties.

Based connected this framework, helium argued that parliamentary signifier – specified arsenic forwarding citizens’ requests to ministries and nationalist services – lies astatine the halfway of governmental practice and cannot beryllium treated arsenic a transgression matter.

Parliamentary Role vs Criminal Responsibility

Stelios Petsas highlighted the favoritism between:

• political practice of citizens
• and transgression liability

He stressed that MPs are successful regular interaction with citizens’ requests, galore of which interest nationalist medication issues, without this constituting illegality.

Stelios Petsas’ involution outlines a wide organization position: parliamentary enactment indispensable not beryllium treated done broad assumptions, portion lifting immunity indispensable stay anindividual, strictly legal, and non-political instrument, respecting the law relation of elected representatives.