Request to lift Plevris immunity: facts and reaction

GREECE. Parliament received a transgression lawsuit against a lawman Thanos Pleurisconcerning the play of his work arsenic Minister of Health.

This was announced by the Chairman of Parliament Nikitas Kaklamanis during the plenary session, clarifying that the materials were transferred done the Ministry of Justice within the established procedure.

At this time, details of the lawsuit are not being disclosed. Neither the nonstop quality of the probe nor the specific actions that were the subject of the reappraisal are reported. What is known is that we are talking astir a process applied when there are signs of imaginable liability of a governmental idiosyncratic during his ministerial term.

Pleuris position

T. Plevris stated that the lawsuit record relates to a suit filed by an worker of the Ministry of Health.

According to him, this is simply a quality related to the proviso of services, and not astir issues related to the absorption of the pandemic oregon the use of European funds, arsenic antecedently assumed.

He besides emphasized that the materials were received not from the European Prosecutor’s Officebut within the model of the nationalist procedure.

Dispute implicit publications

Previously, a fig of publications indicated that the lawsuit was connected with the European Prosecutor’s Office. This accusation was aboriginal clarified, aft which the source of the probe was corrected successful the materials.

Plevris himself, successful turn, stated that the work was “deleted,” which the editors refuted, emphasizing that it was a substance of adjusting the wording, and not of deleting the material.

Fake news. Pronews την ανάρτηση. Η απόσυρση χωρίς σαφή αποκατάσταση είναι άνευ νομικής σημασίας. Όποιος συκοφαντεί λογοδοτεί. pic.twitter.com/0pgop4Wf4u

— Θάνος Πλεύρης (@thanosplevris) April 17, 2026

Editorial comment

The cardinal constituent successful this story remains unchanged: careless of which prosecutor’s bureau initiated the process, we are talking astir a lawsuit successful which the contented of lifting parliamentary immunity is being considered.

At this stage, there is nary nationalist accusation astir the quality of the charges, which leaves country for antithetic interpretations and governmental assessments.

At the aforesaid time, attraction to the wording – nationalist oregon European prosecutors – comes to the fore successful nationalist discussion, while the substantive portion of the lawsuit remains extracurricular the nationalist field.

Thus, the situation is processing connected two planes: legal, where there is not yet sufficient information, and governmental and informational, where assessments and positions of the parties are already being formed.

Continue Reading