The MP Vassiliadis asks for the lifting of immunity for the OPEKEPE case, “My name is indirectly derived from third-party conversations”

A connection was issued by Lakis Vassiliadis, Member of Parliament for Pella with New Democracy, successful which helium some announces his volition to petition the lifting of his parliamentary immunity and firmly denies immoderate engagement successful amerciable enactment related to the OPEKEPE lawsuit successful which his sanction appears.

Vassiliadis emphasizes that “there is nary denotation of immoderate amerciable enactment connected my part,” clarifying that the notation to his sanction arises indirectly done conversations betwixt 3rd parties, without immoderate idiosyncratic interaction betwixt himself oregon his associates and the individuals involved.

Addressing the substance of the case, helium explains that it concerns an alleged petition for an hold of an inspection involving a farmer. However, helium underlines that the inspection was yet carried retired arsenic scheduled, without immoderate hold being granted, without intervention, and without the husbandman receiving immoderate subsidy. As such, helium argues that not lone did nary amerciable enactment occur, but determination was besides nary fiscal damage—“not adjacent minimal”—to nationalist oregon European funds.

Full Statement

In his elaborate statement, Vassiliadis reiterates that a cautious reappraisal of the OPEKEPE record reveals nary grounds of wrongdoing. He notes that the notation of his sanction stems solely from indirect references successful third-party communications and not from immoderate nonstop involvement.

He further explains that the petition attributed to him acrophobic discussions astir a imaginable hold for an upcoming inspection of a farmer. Nonetheless, this hold was ne'er granted, and the audit proceeded normally. The husbandman successful question did not person immoderate subsidy, reinforcing his presumption that nary improper enactment took place.

To destruct immoderate doubts regarding his conduct, Vassiliadis announces that helium volition formally petition the lifting of his parliamentary immunity, stating that helium wants “the information to travel to light.” He adds that helium volition grip the substance with the aforesaid principles that person guided his governmental and idiosyncratic life—honesty, integrity, and transparency.

He concludes by reaffirming his committedness to serving citizens, emphasizing that helium remains accessible to the nationalist and dedicated to addressing their concerns with work and diligence.

What the Case File Shows

According to findings from the European Public Prosecutor’s Office, determination is nary nonstop connection linking Vassiliadis oregon his associates to the case. Instead, his sanction appears successful a connection sent by a 3rd enactment to the president of OPEKEPE, Dimitrios Melas.

In that message, the sender refers to Vassiliadis successful transportation with a petition related to an carnal inspection. Follow-up communications bespeak attempts to hold oregon cancel the inspection. However, these efforts were unsuccessful.

Ultimately, the inspection was carried retired arsenic planned. The husbandman progressive did not person the subsidy—estimated astatine astir €2,500—and was alternatively fined by OPEKEPE.

The lawsuit centers connected indirect references and alleged attempts to power an inspection process that, successful practice, proceeded without interference. Vassiliadis maintains that the facts afloat exonerate him and has taken the measurement of requesting the lifting of his immunity successful bid to let a implicit judicial review.